Table of Contents

Oral presentations

[O01] Performance of published search strategies for studies of diagnostic test accuracy (SDTAs) in Medline and Embase Abstract
Ruth Mitchell, Fiona Rinaldi, Jonathan Craig
[O02] Does the STARD-statement improve the quality of reporting of diagnostic accuracy studies? Abstract
Nynke Smidt, Anne Rutjes, Danielle van der Windt, Raymond Ostelo, Johannes Reitsma, Patrick Bossuyt, Lex Bouter, Henrica de Vet
[O03] Reappraisal of the nested case-control design in diagnostic research: updating the STARD guideline Abstract
Corne Biesheuvel, Yvonne Vergouwe, Ruud Oudega, Arno Hoes, Rick Grobbee, Karel Moons
[O04] The accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis: a diagnostic systematic review carried out according to new Cochrane methods Abstract
Penny Whiting, Roger Harbord, Caroline Main, Jon Deeks, Graziella Filippini, Matthias Egger, Jonathan Sterne
[O05] Follow-up or change scores: does it matter which outcome is used in meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials? Abstract
Jill Hayden, George Tomlinson
[O06] Individual-patient data meta-analysis (IPD MA) in the presence of competing risks Abstract PDF
Iztok Hozo, Benjamin Djulbegovic
[O07] Methodology of subgroup analyses used in individual patient data meta-analyses versus meta-analyses on published data Abstract
Laura Koopman, Geert van der Heijden, Paul Glasziou, Rick Grobbee, Maroeska Rovers
[O08] Exploring the effect of patient characteristics on effectiveness using a combination of individual subject and aggregate level data Abstract PDF
Alex Sutton, Denise Kendrick, Carol Coupland
[O09] Use of evidence in economic decision models: an appraisal of health technology assessments in the UK since 1997 Abstract
Nicola Cooper, Douglas Coyle, Keith Abrams, Miranda Mugford, Alex Sutton
[O10] How do you get the biggest bang for your (limited) buck in depression management? Making sense of complex cost effectiveness data using systematic reviews and the permutation matrix Abstract PDF
Simon Gilbody, Peter Bower, Paula Whitty
[O11] Exploring the variability in cost-effectiveness results within multicountry clinical trials Abstract
Andrea Manca, Marg Hux, Samuel Aballea, Quilici Sibilia, Michael Drummond
[O12] Generalising the results of economic evaluations from high-income to middle-income countries Abstract
Cynthia Iglesias, Federico Augustovski, Sebastian Garcia, Andrea Manca, Adolfo Rubinstein, Michael Drummond
[O13] Facilitative role of Fields: case study of topic prioritisation and reviewer support for production of global health promotion and public health review priorities Abstract PDF
Jodie Doyle, Elizabeth Waters, Nicki Jackson, Sabrina Pit
[O14] Project SEA-ORCHID: South East Asia - Optimising Reproductive and Child Health in Developing Countries Abstract PDF
Steve McDonald
[O15] The South Asian Cochrane Network: supporting reviewers in South Asia and contributing to the global Cochrane agenda Abstract PDF
Prathap Tharyan, Sreekumaran Nair, Steve McDonald, Sally Green
[O16] Identifying trials, or possible trials, conducted in low and middle income countries Abstract PDF
Mark Fenton, Clive Adams, Mahesh Jayaram, Lelia Duley
[O17] 'Spring-cleaning' of Cochrane reviews and clinical guidelines in order to co-ordinate Cochrane reviews and clinical practice Abstract PDF
Jesper Brok, Gorm Greisen, Gluud Christian, Lise-Lotte Gluud
[O18] Overviews of overviews: how to summarise and grade the evidence? Abstract PDF
Gro Jamtvedt, Gunn Vist
[O19] Assessing the body of evidence and grading recommendations in evidence-based clinical practice guidelines Abstract PDF
Philippa Middleton, Rebecca Tooher, Janet Salisbury, Kristina Coleman, Sarah Norris, Karen Grimmer, Susan Hillier
[O20] Implementing best practice guidelines through computerized decision support: providing meaningful tools for cardiovascular risk and diabetes management Abstract PDF
Jeff Harrison, Sue Wells, Rod Jackson
[O21] Constraints on academic freedom in industry-initiated clinical trials Abstract
Peter Gotzsche, Asbjorn Hrobjartsson, Mette Haahr, Douglas Altman, An-Wen Chan
[O22] Is it dangerous to publish reviews in paper journals? Abstract PDF
Vasiliy Vlassov
[O23] Disseminating scientifically sound, clinically relevant literature in the web era: the relevance and newsworthiness of Cochrane reviews Abstract PDF
Chris Cotoi, Brian Haynes, James McKinlay
[O24] Can the impact of an erroneous review be corrected? Abstract PDF
Per Egil Kummervold
[O25] Meta-analysis of studies of diagnostic accuracy: a unified approach Abstract PDF
Roger Harbord, Lucas Bachmann, Jon Deeks, Penny Whiting, Matthias Egger, Jonathan Sterne
[O26] An empirical comparison of methods for meta-analysis of studies of diagnostic accuracy Abstract PDF
Roger Harbord, Lucas Bachmann, Aijing Shang, Penny Whiting, Jon Deeks, Matthias Egger, Jonathan Sterne
[O27] Bivariate meta-analysis of sensitivity and specificity in diagnostic reviews Abstract
Johannes Reitsma, Mariska Leeflang, Anne Rutjes, Rob Scholten, Patrick Bossuyt, Aeilko Zwinderman
[O28] Statistical methods for investigating heterogeneity related to methodological quality in meta-analyses of studies of diagnostic accuracy Abstract
Jon Deeks, Anne Rutjes, Johannes Reitsma, Mariska Leeflang, Patrick Bossuyt
[O29] Non-randomized study designs in US Evidence Practice Center reports Abstract PDF
Susan Norris, David Atkins
[O30] Limiting systematic reviews to RCTs can impose profound bias: the case of cesarean versus vaginal birth Abstract PDF
Carol Sakala
[O31] Should non-randomised studies be included in reviews of interventions for vulnerable groups: a case study from domestic violence research? Abstract PDF
Jean Ramsay, Gene Feder, Geraldine Macdonald
[O32] Re-assessing and revising 'levels of evidence' in the critical appraisal process Abstract PDF
Tracy Merlin, Rebecca Tooher, Adele Weston
[O33] Trials reported in abstracts: the need for a mini-CONSORT Abstract PDF
Sally Hopewell, Mike Clarke
[O34] Publication bias: is it also present in the secondary literature? Abstract PDF
Anne Carter, Glenn Griffin, Thomas Carter
[O35] Country development and publication bias: a review of published studies Abstract PDF
Reza Yousefi Nooraie, Soroush Mortaz Hejri
[O36] Cumulative meta-analysis to determine key milestones in the Life Cycle of Evidence in Cancer Care (LIFE CYCLE) Abstract PDF
Neil Reaume, Pasquale Lorenzo Moja, Munira Nurbhai, Jessie McGowan, Keith O'Rourke, Jeremy Grimshaw, Ian Graham
[O37] Stopping early should be a methodologic quality criterion for Cochrane reviews Abstract PDF
Gordon Guyatt, Victor Montori, Heiner Bucher, Phillip Devereaux, Holger Schunemann, Matthias Briel
[O38] High proportion of high quality randomized clinical trials conducted by the NCI are negative or inconclusive Abstract PDF
Ambuj Kumar, Heloisa Soares, Benjamin Djulbegovic
[O39] PARIS Collaboration: antiplatelets to prevent pre-eclampsia - a review using individual patient data Abstract PDF
Lisa Askie, Lelia Duley, David Henderson-Smart, Lesley Stewart, Marian Showell, Barbara Farrell
[O40] Terminology of herbal medicine used in systematic reviews: standardizing or confusing? Abstract PDF
Jianping Liu
[O41] Translating evidence into patient information: challenges and possible solutions when extracting and presenting the results of Cochrane reviews Abstract PDF
Claire Glenton, Vigdis Underland, Michelle Kho, Andy Oxman
[O42] The effect of alternative graphical displays to present benefits of antibiotics for sore throat on helping people to make treatment choices consistent with their own values Abstract PDF
Cheryl Carling, Doris Kristoffersen, Signe Flottorp, Atle Fretheim, Andy Oxman, Holger Schunemann, Elie Akl, Phillip Devereaux
[O43] Invitations to mammography screening: basis for an informed consent? Abstract pdf
Karsten Juhl Jorgensen, Peter Gotzsche
[O44] Converting odds ratio to risk difference to aid decision making Abstract PDF
Jin Ling Tang, Wilson Tam
[O45] A Community of Practice implementing evidence Abstract PDF
Susan Huckson, Michael Yeoh, Margaret Ferma
[O46] STEPP: Supporting Translation of Evidence into Policy and Practice Abstract PDF
Taryn Young, Leana Olivier, Fanelo Arens, Joy Oliver, Keith Cloete, Jimmy Volmink
[O47] Encouraging and supporting Australian policy makers to use Cochrane reviews: what have we learnt so far? Abstract PDF
Marie Misso, Sue Brennan, Sally Green
[O48] EPOC activities and Australian health policy Abstract PDF
Russell Gruen, Alain Mayhew, Jeremy Grimshaw
[O49] How to determine the best treatment: a mixed-treatment-comparisons meta-analysis (MTM) of trials of topical fluoride therapies for the prevention of dental caries Abstract PDF
Georgia Salanti, Julian Higgins, Valeria Marinho
[O50] Mixed treatment comparison analysis of seven treatments for acute myocardial infarction Abstract PDF
Deborah Caldwell, Tony Ades, Julian Higgins
[O51] A modified test for small study effects in meta-analyses of controlled trials with binary endpoints Abstract PDF
Roger Harbord, Matthias Egger, Jonathan Sterne
[O52] Evidence based sample size calculations for future trials based on meta-analyses Abstract PDF
Alex Sutton, Nicola Cooper, David Jones, Paul Lambert, John Thompson, Keith Abrams
[O53] A better gold pan: capturing RCTs with more precision Abstract
Danielle Anthony, Suzanne Hill, Kent Johnson, Barrie Stokes
[O54] Disentangling the data: variations in data submissions from different players and their potential impact on a systematic review Abstract
Julia Bohlius, Olaf Weingart, Sven Trelle, Andreas Engert
[O55] Mapping trials: the HIV/AIDS trials register leads the way to GIS Mapping Abstract PDF
Karishma Busgeeth, Nandi Siegfried, Gail Kennedy, George Rutherford
[O56] Searching for systematic reviews of adverse effects Abstract PDF
Su Golder, Heather McIntosh, Julie Glanville
[O57] Unknown knowns: use of Cochrane review results in designing new studies Abstract PDF
Nicola Cooper, David Jones, Alex Sutton
[O58] Involving clinical stakeholders in the systematic review process: exercises for low back pain Abstract
Jill Hayden, Rhoda Reardon
[O59] Making connections: knowledge brokering to bring systematic reviews to public health practice Abstract PDF
Kara DeCorby, Maureen Dobbins, Donna Ciliska, Paula Robeson
[O60] Sources of knowledge in clinical practice and knowledge of evidence based medicine in postgraduate medical students and faculty members Abstract PDF
Reza Yousefi Nooraie, Behnam Shakiba, Soroush Mortaz Hejri, Ahmadreza Soroush
[O61] Evidence-based medicine program for a health plan in Brazil: coverage criteria for new technology-based interventions - an update Abstract PDF
André Sasse, Emma Sasse, Luciana Clark, Otavio Clark
[O62] Role of Cochrane systematic reviews in health technology assessment in Argentina Abstract PDF
Agustin Ciapponi, Andres Pichon-Riviere
[O63] Use of systematic reviews in clinical practice guidelines: case study of development of clinical practice guideline by a professional organization in Indonesia Abstract PDF
Mohammad Hakimi
[O64] Making the resources of the Cochrane Collaboration 'of, by and for the people': a developing country perspective Abstract PDF
Joseph Mathew, Meenu Singh
[O65] How can consumer input be integrated into the systematic review process? Abstract PDF
Dell Horey, Carol Grant-Pearce, Gill Gyte, Cathy Neale, Sandy Oliver, Carol Sakala, Jane Taylor
[O66] Informed consumers as drivers of evidence based medicine: a trial Abstract
Melanie Harris, Brian Smith, Antony Veale, Adrian Esterman, Peter Frith, Pam Selim
[O67] Patient mediated interventions to increase adoption of evidence: aids and barriers to an intervention in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) Abstract
Melanie Harris, Deborah Wildgoose, Antony Veale, Brian Smith
[O68] Quality improvement and evidence-based decision making on problems of communication with patients and their families in hospitals Abstract
Sophie Hill, Angela Melder
[O69] Inter-reviewer agreement: an analysis of the degree to which agreement occurs when using tools for the appraisal, extraction and meta-synthesis of qualitative research findings Abstract PDF
Zuben Florence, Tim Schulz, Alan Pearson
[O70] Integrating 'qualitative' studies and trials in reviews: reflections from reviews about teenage pregnancy, parenthood and social exclusion Abstract PDF
Angela Harden, Ann Oakley, Ginny Brunton, Adam Fletcher
[O71] Healthy work environments: the experience of conducting a series of comprehensive systematic reviews, including the review of qualitative research and non-research data Abstract PDF
Zoe Jordan, Kylie Porritt, Alan Pearson
[O72] A priority-setting mechanism for national evidence-based consumer health information: the criteria and their application to Cochrane reviews Abstract PDF
Hilda Bastian, Martina Burger, Beate Zschorlich

Poster presentations

[P001] International activity within Collaborative Review Groups Abstract
Claire Allen, Diana Wyatt, Mike Clarke
[P002] QUADAS: early experience with a new methodological scoring tool for diagnostic meta-analyses Abstract
Kai Bauwens, Axel Ekkernkamp, Dirk Stengel
[P003] Lacking evidence for patient preference effects in clinical trials with parallel randomized and observational arms Abstract
Dirk Stengel, Jalid Sehouli, Franz Porzsolt
[P004] Coping with surgeon’s doubts on negative meta-analyses: the case of the EU Hernia Trialists Abstract
Dirk Stengel, Axel Ekkernkamp, Kai Bauwens
[P005] Understanding the relationship between risks and odds ratios Abstract
Ian Shrier, Russell Steele
[P006] Methodological quality of randomised controlled trials of Chinese medicinal herbs for treating influenza Abstract
Xiaoyan Chen, Taixiang Wu, Guanjian Liu
[P007] How Wiley have developed media coverage of Cochrane Library reviews within the international press Abstract
Alexa Dugan, Deborah Pentesco-Gilbert
[P008] What do patients and physicians want at the point of care? Preliminary surveys in China Abstract
Mingming Zhang, Jing Li, Xiaoli Zhang, Li Wang, Liang Du
[P009] The evidence for nursing interventions in the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews Abstract
Patriek Mistiaen, Else Poot, Sophie Hickox, Cordula Wagner
[P010] An examination of the impact of different types of trial materials included in the Cochrane reviews of interventions for treating distal radial fracture in adults Abstract
Helen Handoll
[P011] Effect of teaching evidence-based medicine in medical postgraduates Abstract
Jin Chen,Jing Li, Jing Li, Bi-rong Dong
[P012] Issues in analyses of behavioural change in a systematic review Abstract
Linda Gowing
[P013] Evidence-based medicine developments in Peking University in China Abstract
Yong Hua Hu, Jin Ling Tang
[P014] Using the Medical Research Council framework for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of complex interventions to identify and develop strategies to promote effective professional practice Abstract
Margaret Watson, Christine Bond, Jeremy Grimshaw, Marie Johnston, Anne Walker
[P015] A bivariate meta-analysis of sensitivity and specificity: accuracy of maternal serum human choriongonadotrophin (MShCG) determination in the prediction of pre-eclampsia Abstract
Jeltsje Cnossen, Joris van der Post, Ben Mol, Khalid Khan, Gerben ter Riet
[P016] Thai Cochrane Network contribution on handsearching Abstract
Jadsada Thinkhamrop, Pisake Lumbiganon, Wimonrat Krisanapakornkit, Nuanjan Sornpanya, Jeerawan Dhanasen, Poonsub Assatroo
[P017] Incorporating methodological quality in meta-analyses of diagnostic accuracy studies Abstract
Mariska Leeflang, Rob Scholten, Hans Reitsma, Anne Rutjes, Jon Deeks, Patrick Bossuyt
[P018] Working in partnership with people in the developing world Abstract
Liv Reinar, Trisha Greenhalgh
[P019] Designing and implementing a Latin-American clinical trials registry (LATINREC) Abstract
Ludovic Reveiz, Andrés Felipe Cardona, Edgar Guillermo Ospina, Martha Beatriz Delgado
[P020] Contribution of checking reference lists to systematic reviews Abstract
Tanya Armour, Orvie Dingwall, Margaret Sampson
[P021] African Trials Register: 5 years later, where are we now? Abstract
Elizabeth Pienaar
[P022] Handsearching for 'buried' randomized trials in Bahrain medical journals Abstract
Zbys Fedorowicz, Fawzi Amin, Anne Eisinga, Jamal Al-Sayyad
[P023] Key problems in the economic reviews. There remained several discrepant opinions on the review techniques, such as applicability of foreign studies, overall quality of economic studies, and addressing study heterogeneity. Abstract
Xin Sun, Ewa Orlewska,, Huan Yang, Youping Li
[P024] Preliminary study of citation rates of reviews of interventions for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) Abstract
Elizabeth Arnold, Toby Lasserson
[P025] Evidence for the effectiveness of occupational health interventions Abstract
Jani Ruotsalainen, Jos Verbeek, Jukka Salmi, Merja Jauhiainen, Irja Laamanen, Iris Pasternack, Kaj Husman
[P026] Anticipating policy makers' needs: moving toward health intelligence at WHO/Europe Abstract
Shubhada Watson, Jane Wallace
[P027] Economic impact of an evidence based assessment of bone densitometry in a private health plan in Brazil Abstract
Emma Sasse, André Sasse, Luciana Clark, Otavio Clark
[P028] Responses to a systematic review Abstract
Peter Herbison, Jean Hay-Smith
[P029] Distraction from randomisation in diagnostic research Abstract
Corne Biesheuvel, Rick Grobbee, Karel Moons
[P030] Quality analysis of literatures on clinical randomized controlled trial of pre-eclampsia treated with TCM Abstract
Jin Zhang, Taixiang Wu
[P031] Actual usage of the Cochrane Library in teaching hospitals in Australia Abstract
Deepti Singhal, Nimit Singhal
[P032] Ethics and the evidence in medical school education: melding outpatient medical ethics with training in evidence-based medicine Abstract
Frank Domino, James Comes, Len Levin
[P033] Case-control and two-gate designs in diagnostic accuracy studies Abstract
Anne Rutjes, Johannes Reitsma, Jan Vandenbroucke, Afina Glas, Patrick Bossuyt
[P034] Partial and differential verification in diagnostic accuracy studies Abstract
Anne Rutjes, Johannes Reitsma,, Les Irwig, Patrick Bossuyt
[P035] Mapping the Cochrane evidence for decision-making in health care Abstract
Regina Paolucci El Dib, Alvaro Atallah, Regis Bruni Andriolo
[P036] Comparing a systematic review with a Cochrane protocol (submitted, not published) on the subject of Coenzyme Q10 (CoQ) and heart failure Abstract
Deborah Hilton, Henry Krum, Frank Rosenfeldt
[P037] Left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) diagnosis: a systematic review and the effect of publication bias Abstract
Deborah Hilton, Christopher Reid, Garry Jennings
[P038] Is it reasonable to pool different estimates of intervention effect calculated from different methods? Abstract
Joanne McKenzie, Jon Deeks, Peter Herbison, Sally Green
[P039] The role of student scholarships in Cochrane reviews Abstract
Richard Wood-Baker, Haydn Walters, Julia Walters
[P040] The importance of context: how can evidence-based knowledge best be presented to clinicians in the mental health field? Abstract
Oystein Eiring
[P041] The rising importance of Cochrane systematic reviews in a Latin-American evidence-based journal Abstract
Agustin Ciapponi
[P042] Investigation for randomisation procedure of Chinese original studies Abstract
Taixiang Wu, Xiaoyan Chen, Juan Ni, Jiafu Wei, Jin Zhang, Jun Chen, Na Zhao, Likun Zhou
[P043] Bibliometric analyses along cumulative meta-analyses: the Life Cycle of Evidence in Cancer Care (LIFE CYCLE) Abstract
Jessie McGowan, Munira Nurbhai, Neil Reaume, Pasquale Lorenzo Moja, Ian Graham
[P044] Assessing the quality of randomized controlled trials evaluating nonpharmacological treatments: a CheckList to Evaluate A Report of NonPharmacological Trial (CLEAR NPT) Abstract
Isabelle Boutron, David Moher, Peter Tugwell, Bruno Giraudeau, Serge Poiraudeau,, Remy Nizard, Philippe Ravaud
[P045] Assessing the success of blinding in randomized controlled trials Abstract
Isabelle Boutron, Candice Estellat
[P046] Reporting of harm in randomized controlled trials evaluating pharmacological and nonpharmacological treatments Abstract
Morgane Ethgen, Isabelle Boutron, Gabriel Baron, Bruno Giraudeau, Jean Sibilia, Philippe Ravaud
[P047] Taxonomy of occupational health interventions could be helpful for reviewers Abstract
Jos Verbeek
[P048] Software for handsearching control and management of randomized and clinical controlled trials Abstract
Daniel Zavala-Jaspe, Arturo Marti-Carvajal
[P049] Self care interventions: which outcomes are important to consumers? Abstract
Gerry Richardson
[P050] DEC-NET: the European register of clinical trials on medicines for children Abstract
Eugenio Santoro, Valentina Rossi, Chiara Pandolfini, Maurizio Bonati
[P051] Quality analysis of randomized controlled trials on Chinese medicinal herbs for unstable angina pectoris Abstract
Qin Wang, Taixiang Wu, Xin Gao,Xiaoyan Chen
[P052] Guidelines for systematic reviews of health promotion and public health interventions: evaluating their use in practice Abstract
Nicki Jackson, Elizabeth Waters, Rebecca Rees, Jodie Doyle
[P053] The experience of introducing a new drug into the hospital Abstract
Tsung-Kun Lin, Chuan-Fang Lee, Wen-Shyong Liou
[P054] Most health web sites are inaccessible, unusable and unreliable: a call for action Abstract
Douglas Badenoch, Gemma Healy, Sally Hunt, Andre Tomlin
[P055] To what extent are conference abstracts reporting randomised controlled trials of skin diseases published subsequently? Abstract
Finola Delamere, Hywel Williams
[P056] HIV/AIDS and oral candidiasis: what really works? Abstract
Elizabeth Pienaar, Taryn Young, Haly Holmes
[P057] A shortcut for developing evidence based pregnancy guidelines by adapting already existing ones to local constraints in Belgium Abstract
Wei-Hong Zhang, Sophie Alexander, Bernard Spitz, Katleen Lodewyckx, Gert Peeters, Marleen Temmerman, Francoise Mambourg, Dirk Ramaekers
[P058] The use of Cochrane abstracts on PDAs at the point-of-care: effect on clinical behavior Abstract
Fred Tudiver,Doug Rose,Rick Wallace,Debi Pfortmiller
[P059] The EBM OSCE to assess skills of information mastery and use of best evidence Abstract
Fred Tudiver, Burt Banks, Doug Rose
[P060] Optimal retrieval of HIV/AIDS conference proceeding abstracts: a comparison of databases Abstract
Karishma Busgeeth, Nandi Siegfried
[P061] Improving our quality by developing the HIV/AIDS Specialized Register: experiences and lessons from the inaugural Cochrane Collaboration Visiting Fellowship Abstract
Karishma Busgeeth, Nandi Siegfried, Mark Fenton, Clive Adams, Mike Clarke, Anne Eisinga, Carol Lefebvre, Gail Kennedy
[P062] The interobserver reliability in the assessment of methodological quality of RCTs and CCTs in the addiction field Abstract
Silvia Minozzi, Simona Vecchi
[P063] Comparison of NNT statistics, impact numbers and epidemiological effect measures Abstract
Ralf Bender, Mandy Hildebrandt, Maria Blettner
[P064] HIV/AIDS reviewer mentoring programme for South Asia Abstract
Sreekumaran Nair, Vinod Bhat Hattangadi, George Rutherford, Gail Kennedy
[P065] Conducting a broad organisational systematic review: examining the effect of sensory environments on health-related outcomes of hospital patients Abstract
Amy Drahota, Tara Dean, Rebecca Stores, Derek Ward, Elizabeth Galloway
[P066] Most accessed Cochrane reviews in The Cochrane Library and most accessed review abstracts on www.cochrane.org Abstract
Greg Saunders, Dave Booker
[P067] Analysing and presenting results from systematic reviews of complex interventions Abstract
Gro Jamtvedt, Jane Young, Doris Tove Kristoffersen, Andy Oxman
[P068] The Cochrane Dementia Group's Register of trials: a unique resource for dementia specialists Abstract
Dymphna Hermans, Jacqueline Birks, Rupert McShane
[P069] RCTs for policy interventions? A review of reviews Abstract
James Thomas, Rebecca Rees, Zoe Garrett, Sandy Oliver
[P070] Graphical presentation of diagnostic information: a methodological review Abstract
Penny Whiting, Marie Westwood, Jon Deeks, Roger Harbord, Lucas Bachmann, Matthias Egger, Jonathan Sterne
[P071] Testing approaches to searching for public health reviews Abstract
Josephine Kavanagh
[P072] Potential for impact of Cochrane-style systematic reviews in the field of veterinary public health Abstract
Susan Read, Jan Sargeant, Andrijana Rajic
[P073] Using systematic review methods to assess the evidence on performance of measurement instruments in wound care Abstract
Susan O'Meara, Martin Bland, Nicky Cullum
[P074] Development of a search strategy to identify evaluations of the performance of wound measurement instruments Abstract
Susan O'Meara
[P075] Transformation of summary statistics from a skewed distribution into summary statistics on the log scale Abstract
Ashley Jones, Rosalind Smyth, Deborah Ashby
[P076] Adjustment for covariates in non-randomized studies: propensity score based methods vs classical regression models Abstract
Claudia Schmoor, Angelika Caputo, Erika Graf
[P077] Why a Cochrane Diet and Nutrition Sub-Field? Abstract
Jaap Van Binsbergen, Lorne Becker
[P078] Mass media interventions for promoting HIV testing: challenges of incorporating interrupted time series analysis Abstract
Janaki Vidanapathirana, Michael Abramson, Christopher Fairley
[P079] Inclusion criteria for systematic reviews: what is the most valid approach? Abstract
Ian Shrier, Howard Schachter, Jean-Francois Boivin, Robert Platt, Russell Steele, Ritz Kakuma, Louise Pilotte
[P080] A simplified search strategy for identifying randomised controlled trials for systematic reviews of health care interventions: a comparison with more exhaustive strategies Abstract
Pamela Royle, Norman Waugh
[P081] Health policy integrating with systematic reviews Abstract
Penny Rochfort
[P082] Increasing specificity in searches of PubMed for health promotion and public health studies: Abstract
Chloe Powell, Josephine Kavanagh, Ginny Brunton, Rebecca Rees, Elizabeth Waters
[P083] Are they doing what it says on the packet? Towards an implementation fidelity index for use in systematic reviews Abstract
Paul Montgomery, Frances Gardner, Evan Mayo Wilson, Steven Tamayo
[P084] Reporting of the role of the expert searcher in Cochrane reviews Abstract
Margaret Sampson, Jessie McGowan
[P085] Evidence review: evaluating Health Technology Assessment searches Abstract
Margaret Sampson, Jessie McGowan
[P086] Analytical validity of molecular techniques for BRCA1 and BRCA2 genetic testing for breast and ovarian cancer: a systematic review Abstract
Ritsuko Kakuma, Lynda McGahan, Janet Joyce
[P087] Psychosocial implications of BRCA1 and BRCA2 genetic testing for breast and ovarian cancer: a systematic review Abstract
Lynda McGahan, Ritsuko Kakuma, Janet Joyce
[P088] A systematic review of physical tests used in the diagnosis of shoulder impingement: a Cochrane experience Abstract
Nigel Hanchard, Helen Handoll
[P089] Development of a new prioritization method for health technology assessment Abstract
Hussein Noorani, Rhonda Boudreau, Becky Skidmore, Don Husereau
[P090] How long does it take to publish a high quality trial in oncology? Abstract
Heloisa Soares, Ambuj Kumar, Mike Clarke, Benjamin Djulbegovic
[P091] Case study on comprehensive searching in the area of overcrowding in emergency departments Abstract
Carol Friesen, Lisa Hartling, Ken Bond, Maria Ospina, Brian Rowe
[P092] Transferability of evidence based information driven by Clinical Evidence through an Italian continuing education programme on the web: a qualitative study Abstract
Ivan Moschetti, Lorenzo Moja, Alison Steven, Luciana Ballini, Alessandro Liberati
[P093] Can we trust the conclusion in peer-review publications? A review of quality improvement intervention studies Abstract
Linda Li,, Lorenzo Moja, Alberto Romero, Jeremy Grimshaw
[P094] Exploring language barriers to evidence based medicine: is it different to read a Cochrane review abstract in English or in Spanish for Chilean post graduate medical students? Abstract
Luz Letelier, Gianella Caiozzi, Maricarmen Andrade, Luigi Gabrielli, Nicolas Zamarin, Paola Viviani, Juan Pablo Ortega
[P095] Clinical teachers' attitudes towards the efficacy of evidence-based medicine workshop and self-reported ability in evidence-based practice in Iran Abstract
Jalil Kohpayezadeh, Kamran Soltani Arabshahi, Hamid Reza Baradaran
[P096] An holistic research design for Integrative Medicine Abstract
Roger Simpson
[P097] Study settings of Cochrane HIV/AIDS systematic reviews Abstract
Janaki Vidanapathirana
[P098] Reducing duplication: an example of collaboration between guideline developers and Cochrane Collaborative Review Groups Abstract
Jill Parnham, Esther Coren, Harriet MacLehose
[P099] Evidence in social welfare: challenges and some possible solutions Abstract
Esther Coren
[P100] Cochrane Review Initiative Project (CRIP) Abstract
Mazen Ferwana, Bander Knawy, Kameshwar Prasad
[P101] Analyzing the quality of clinical randomized control trial of Traditional Chinese Medicine for coronary heart disease (CHD) Abstract
Xin Duan, Likun Zhou, Taixiang Wu
[P102] Should sensitivities derived from 2x1 tables be included in diagnostic systematic reviews: a review of systematic reviews Abstract
Kelly Russell, Nicola Hooton, Sandra Blitz, Carol Spooner, Jeremy Beach, Brian Rowe
[P103] Level of evidence in evidence-based guidelines in colorectal surgery Abstract
Lasse Schmidt, Peer Wille-Jørgensen
[P104] Efficacy of short courses of critical appraisal on the skills and attitude of postgraduate medical students Abstract
Sara Mortaz Hejri, Babak Mostafazadeh Davani, Mahtab Rabbani Anari, Ahamadreza Jonaidi, Reza Yousefi Nooraie, Akbar Soltani
[P105] Accuracy of the Spanish translated conclusions of Cochrane systematic reviews Abstract
Agustin Ciapponi, Amanda Burls, Vilma Irazola
[P106] Meta-analyses and systematic reviews of quality of life outcomes: preliminary results and work in progress Abstract
Donald Patrick, Catherine Acquadro, Gordon Guyatt
[P107] Staff and consumer perceptions of research in mental health settings Abstract
Michelle Cleary, Glenn Hunt, Adele Freeman, Garry Walter
[P108] Handsearching for health promotion and public health trials and systematic reviews Abstract
Nicki Jackson, Sabrina Gupta, Faline Howes, Rebecca Armstrong, Ginny Brunton, Rebecca Rees, Jodie Doyle, Elizabeth Waters
[P109] Calculating standardised mean differences from cluster randomised trials using published sources Abstract
Ian White, James Thomas
[P110] What are the barriers preventing authors from reading written instructions? Abstract
Jane Cracknell, Nete Villebro, Mark Cracknell
[P111] Endometrial ablation for heavy menstrual bleeding: the relationship between funding sources and trial outcome Abstract
Alisa Higgins, Sarah Lord, Sally Wortley, Josephine Belcher
[P112] Is timing important in systematic reviews of interventions for breast cancer? Abstract
Sven Mieog, Davina Ghersi
[P113] Developing an overview of systematic reviews: a framework for synthesising the evidence on interventions to improve communication with, Abstract
Rebecca Ryan, Sophie Hill
[P114] Prospective collaborative meta-analysis of trials of weight management interventions in childhood overweight and obesity Abstract
Kate Steinbeck, Louise Baur, Anne Morris, Davina Ghersi
[P115] Evidence-based change: a 'how-to' guide from the Health for Kids team Abstract
Claire Harris, Tari Turner, Fiona Wilkinson
[P116] Utilization, impact and barriers to use the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews: survey on Chilean post graduate medical students Abstract
Daniel Capurro, Solange Rivera, Francisco Larrondo
[P117] How do Cochrane reviewers handle sparse data in their systematic reviews? Abstract
Malinee Laopaiboon, Porjai Pattanittum, Chetta Ngamjarus, Weerawat Patthaisong
[P118] Can summarising trials of public health strategies by camparator design improve interpretation? Abstract
Philip Baker, Roger Thomas, Diane Lorenzetti
[P119] Ten years of handsearching in Germany: results and future prospects Abstract
Anette Blumle, Gerd Antes
[P120] Occupational health Cochrane systematic reviews: an overview Abstract
Eva Schonstein, Jos Verbeek
[P121] Peer review and editorial decision-making at major biomedical journals Abstract
Kirby Lee, Elizabeth Boyd, James Lightwood, Lisa Bero
[P122] Priorities, publication and progress in reviewing treatment for peripheral nerve disorders Abstract
Kate Jewitt, David Cornblath, Angela Gunn, Denise O'Connor, Richard Hughes
[P123] Putting Africa first: supporting novice authors of HIV/AIDS reviews in Africa Abstract
Joy Oliver, Nandi Siegfried, Gail Kennedy, Tara Horvath
[P124] What can The Cochrane Collaboration do to support people living in developing countries? A survey Abstract
Joy Oliver, Taryn Young
[P125] Changes in knowledge and utilisation of the Cochrane Collaboration by primary health care workers in Argentina from 2002 to 2005 Abstract
Agustin Ciapponi, Carina Fernandez
[P126] From complex systematic reviews to clear effective clinical pathways: interpreting the evidence for primary and secondary prevention of osteoporotic fracture into a clinical guideline algorithm Abstract
Jo Brett
[P127] From many to one: converting different databases into an XML database Abstract
Marko Ekqvist, Kristian Wahlbeck
[P128] Guideline development and Cochrane reviews part 1 Abstract
Will Gray, Maggie Westby, Elizabeth Gibbons, Elizabeth McInnes, Ian Bullock
[P129] Guideline development and Cochrane reviews part 2 Abstract
Will Gray, Maggie Westby, Elizabeth Gibbons, Elizabeth McInnes, Ian Bullock
[P130] Does a training in evidence based clinical psychology improve skills in evidence based clinical psychology? Abstract
Andrew Baillie, Lorna Peters
[P131] Mapping the terrain: searching for cancer systematic reviews for the Cancer Specialist Library Abstract
Gemma Healy, Sally Hunt, Lena Nordheim, Chris Alcock
[P132] Finding the gold: identifying good quality systematic reviews for the Cancer Specialist Library Abstract
Gemma Healy, Sally Hunt, Lena Nordheim, Chris Alcock
[P133] Agreeing to disagree: an analysis of the responses to critical appraisal questions in postgraduate students Abstract
Emily Petherick, Nicky Cullum, Martin Bland
[P134] Cochrane and nursing: are needs being met? Abstract
Emily Petherick, Nicky Cullum
[P135] Comparison of test performance of liquid-based versus conventional Pap smears to detect cervical cancer precursors Abstract
Marc Arbyn, Philippe Delvenne, Claire Bourgain, Christine Bergeron, Paul Klinkhamer, Johan Bulten
[P136] Trial sequential analyses of six Cochrane neonatal group meta-analyses considering adequacy of allocation concealment Abstract
Jesper Brok, Kristian Thorlund, Jørn Wetterslev, Christian Gluud
[P137] Trends in methodological quality of randomised clinical trials in low back pain: comparing drug trials with non-drug trials Abstract
Bart Koes, Antti Malmivaara, Maurits van Tulder
[P138] Overview and reanalysis of systematic reviews on invasive strategies for acute coronary syndromes Abstract
Pekka Kuukasjarvi, Antti Malmivaara, Marjukka Makela
[P139] The German Institute for Quality and Efficiency in Health Care (IQWiG) Abstract
Hanna Kirchner, Stefan Lange, Peter Sawicki
[P140] Trial sequential analyses of six meta-analyses considering heterogeneity and trial weight Abstract
Kristian Thorlund, Jørn Wetterslev, Jesper Brok, Christian Gluud
[P141] Heterogeneity sample size correction factor for meta-analyses Abstract
Kristian Thorlund, Jorn Wetterslev, Jesper Brok, Christian Gluud
[P142] Guideline development and Cochrane reviews: criteria and principles for selecting systematic reviews to answer guideline clinical questions Abstract
Elizabeth McInnes, Elizabeth Gibbons, Maggie Westby, Will Gray
[P143] How relevant is the choice of the outcome in meta-analyses using relative risk as summary statistic? Abstract
Roberto D’Amico, Patrizia Schifano, Laura Amato, Roberto Vicini, Marina Davoli
[P144] Knowledge transfer at the Public Health Agency of Canada Abstract
Geoffrey Gurd
[P145] Should there be Cochrane reviews of disease aetiology? A discussion poster Abstract
Norman Waugh, Pamela Royle, Lynda Bain, Lynn Robertson
[P146] Checking important journals for important trials: does this make sense? Abstract
Gergana Ivanova, Cornelia Beimfohr, Sindy Matschewsky, Christina Niederstadt, Elke Vervölgyi, Beate Wieseler, Thomas Kaiser
[P147] The use of non-randomized studies in the Cochrane reviews on drugs and alcohol Abstract
Federica Vigna-Taglianti, Federica Mathis, David Foxcroft, Laura Amato, Marina Davoli, Fabrizio Faggiano
[P148] How is the networking around the world? Abstract
Josep Garcia-Alamino, Jordi Pardo, José Exposito Losada, Xavier Bonfill Cosp
[P149] How much published data is usable for meta-analysis in aetiological research? Abstract
Geertruida Bekkering, Ross Harris, Steve Thomas, Anne-Marie Mayer, Rebecca Beynon, Roger Harbord, George Davey Smith, Jonathan Sterne
[P150] The global reach of The Cochrane Library: six months of usage statistics on Wiley InterScience Abstract
Laura Mellor, Deborah Pentesco-Gilbert
[P151] Impact of Cochrane systematic reviews of public health interventions for physical activity Abstract
Andrew Mashoian, Elizabeth Waters, Rebecca Armstrong, Jodie Doyle
[P152] The 'MIX’ program: free software for learning, teaching and exploring meta-analysis with Excel Abstract
Leon Bax, Harukazu Tsuruta, Noriaki Ikeda
[P153] Quality assessment in systematic reviews of prognosis: descriptive analysis, development and testing of new recommendations Abstract
Jill Hayden, Pierre Cote, Greta Ridley, Claire Bombardier
[P154] The Cochrane Library used in education: www.peditop.com Abstract
Inge Axelsson
[P155] The multiplicity problem in systematic reviews Abstract
Katharina Biester, Stefan Lange
[P156] Editorial strategy for revising Cochrane reviews: does it help? Abstract
Vittoria Lutje, Harriet MacLehose, Paul Garner
[P157] Frequency and characteristics of new evidence found in Clinical Evidence updates Abstract
Luis Gabriel Cuervo, Mike Clarke, Kourosh Mojar
[P158] Country of affiliation for the authors of an international evidence-based healthcare publication: an evaluation of Clinical Evidence Abstract
Luis Gabriel Cuervo, Mike Clarke, Alan Thomas, Alex McNeil, Kourosh Mojar, David Tovey
[P159] Survey of the use of Cochrane Style Guide guidance in published Cochrane reviews Abstract
Harriet MacLehose, Laura Mellor, Tracey Remmington
[P160] Quality of systematic reviews used to build guidelines on prevention and treatment of breast and colorectal cancers Abstract
Federica Vigna-Taglianti,, Federica Mathis, Fabrizio Faggiano, Paolo Vineis, Alessandro Liberati
[P161] The value of Cochrane reviews in the clinical practice of university-based surgeons in a developing country Abstract
Marie Carmela Lapitan
[P162] The need to collaborate for updating systematic reviews Abstract
Julia Bohlius, Jayne Wilson, Susan Brunskill, Sue Bayliss, Josie Sandercock, Thilo Kober, Andreas Engert, Chris Hyde
[P163] How accessible is the Cochrane Library for health professionals with little or no previous knowledge of the site? Abstract
Sarah Rosenbaum, Claire Glenton
[P164] Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Abstract
Erik von Elm, Stuart Pocock, Jan Vandenbroucke, Douglas Altman, Matthias Egger
[P165] Economic evaluations of prenatal screening for trisomy 21: a systematic review of the methodogology Abstract
Hanna Koskinen
[P166] How do authors respond to written requests for additional information? Abstract
James Guevara, Ron Keren, Snejana Nihtianova, Joseph Zorc
[P167] Ask the author? Does it make a difference to quality assessment? Abstract
Jayne Wilson, Julia Bohlius, Simon Langensiepen, Susan Brunskill, Chris Hyde
[P168] Systematic reviews of knowledge translation interventions: contributions of process evaluations and contact with authors Abstract
Anna Farmer, Jessie McGowan, Ian Graham, Alain Mayhew, Michele Driedger, Kaveh Shojania, Jeremy Grimshaw
[P169] What happens when you take the Cochrane methodology and apply it to non-clinical literature? Abstract
Emma Irvin
[P170] Case report of a satellite effort: The Denver Satellite of the Cochrane Skin Group Abstract
Robert Dellavalle
[P171] Use of Evidence-based nursing (EBN) by nurses in Belgium Abstract
Micheline Gobert, Emmanuel Simoens, Benoît Boland, Karin Hannes
[P172] The equivalence or non-inferiority problem in systematic reviews Abstract
Stefan Lange, Katharina Biester
[P173] A tale of four review groups Abstract
Victoria Pennick, Lesley Gillespie, Lara Maxwell, Alain Mayhew
[P174] Finding full text copies of randomised trials, or possible randomised trials, from low and middle income countries Abstract
Drew Davey, Clive Adams, Mark Fenton, Lelia Duley
[P175] Evidence based audit in oncology: analyses of three health plans in Brazil Abstract
Otavio Clark, Luciana Clark, Emma Sasse, André Sasse
[P176] Economic impact of an evidence based approach to tumor marker requests in a health plan in Brazil Abstract
Luciana Clark, Otavio Clark, Andre Sasse, Emma Sasse
[P177] Distal pancreatectomy: a randomized controlled trial to compare two different surgical techniques Abstract
Markus Diener, Hanns-Peter Knaebel, Moritz Wente, Markus Bachler, Christoph Seiler
[P178] Building a specialized register of behavioral medicine interventions Abstract
Louise Falzon
[P179] Behavioral medicine: providing another perspective of trial methodologies Abstract
Karina Davidson, Kimberlee Trudeau, Louise Falzon, Evelyn Whitlock
[P180] Assessing the quality of information recorded on trial registries Abstract
Munira Nurbhai, Jeremy Grimshaw, Pasquale Lorenzo Moja, Alessandro Liberati, An-Wen Chan, Kay Dickersin, Karmela Krezla-Jeric, David Moher
[P181] Do province-wide access to The Cochrane Library and training sessions make a difference? Abstract
Dorothy Forbes,Janet Bangma,Alexa Briggs,, Janet Bangma, Alexa Briggs, Maureen Bingham, Christine Marshall, Shari Furniss, Kathie Clark
[P182] Pre-specifying sample size calculations and statistical analyses in randomised trials: comparison of protocols to publications Abstract
An-Wen Chan, Asbjorn Hrobjartsson, Britta Tendal, Peter Gøtzsche, Douglas Altman
[P183] How should clinicians and policy makers implement case management for depression? Using meta-regression to open up the black box of a complex intervention Abstract
Simon Gilbody, Peter Bower, Alex Sutton, David Richards, Janine Fletcher
[P184] The impact of including CBA and ITS designs in Cochrane reviews Abstract
Alain Mayhew, Jessie McGowan, Simon Lewin, Jeremy Grimshaw
[P185] Canadian Cochrane Centre Education and Training Project 2004-05 Abstract
Miranda Cumpston, Kathie Clark, Arne Ohlsson, Alain Mayhew, Jeremy Grimshaw, Don Husereau, Denise O'Connor, Rebecca Wong
[P186] Training handsearchers: going from a paper to a web-based course Abstract
Roberta Scherer, Suzanne Brodney Folse, Christine Costantino
[P187] Systematic reviews of economic data: preliminary steps in an emerging methodology Abstract
Rick Wiechula, Tiffany Conroy-Hiller
[P188] The use of evidence based medicine in promoting the social acceptance of family planning in the Philippines Abstract
Mario Festin
[P189] Evidence based medicine in the curriculum in medical schools in South East Asia Abstract
Mario Festin
[P190] Reporting on the quality of randomised controlled trials in prehospital care Abstract
Ayan Sen, Erin Smith
[P191] Four systematic reviews per day: the epidemiology of research synthesis Abstract
Hilda Bastian, Paul Glasziou

Workshop presentations

[W01] Systematic reviews of diagnostic accuracy studies 1: an introduction to formulating the study question and identifying eligible studies Abstract
Patrick Bossuyt, Roberto D'Amico, Graziella Filippini, Brian Haynes, Henrica de Vet
[W02] Selecting the best treatment: the role of multiple treatments meta-analysis in Cochrane reviews Abstract
Georgia Salanti, Deborah Caldwell, Julian Higgins
[W03] Methods for synthesising qualitative data Abstract
Jane Noyes, Jennie Popay
[W04] Systematic reviews of health promotion and public health interventions Abstract
Rebecca Armstrong, Jodie Doyle
[W05] An introduction to literature searching for systematic reviews Abstract
Carol Friesen, Sylvia Bickley
[W06] Using ProCite for creating and submitting trials databases to CENTRAL Abstract
Eric Manheimer, Gail Higgins, Susan Wieland
[W07] The Cochrane Library hands-on searching (introduction) Abstract
Deborah Pentesco-Gilbert
[W08] Synthesising economic evaluations from different countries: challenges for Cochrane reviewers Abstract
Cynthia Iglesias, Andrea Manca, Michael Drummond
[W09] The language of evidence Abstract
Janet Salisbury
[W10] Educational strategies to build capacity in the generation and implementation of evidence in developing countries: the SEA-ORCHID Project Abstract
Jackie Ho, Pisake Lumbiganon, Cath Chamberlain, Ruth Martis, Jacki Short, David Henderson-Smart
[W11] A systematic approach to involving consumers in the review process Abstract
Andrew Herxheimer, Gill Gyte
[W12] Technical editing part II Abstract
Margaret Cooter, Laura Mellor
[W13] Investigating and dealing with bias in systematic reviews Abstract
Jonathan Sterne, Sue Duval
[W14] Narratives of evidence-based health care Abstract
Jeanne Daly, Sophie Hill, Judith Lumley, Iain Chalmers, Gordon Guyatt
[W15] Entity websites: a hands-on workshop to lighten your site maintenance work Abstract
Dave Booker, Greg Saunders
[W16] Utilising Cochrane reviews in clinical guideline development Abstract
Will Gray, Maggie Westby
[W17] Train the trainers: techniques for training systematic reviewers Abstract
Swaroop Vedula, Joyce Coutu
[W18] Systematic reviews of diagnostic accuracy studies 2: assessment of methodological quality Abstract
Penny Whiting, Anne Rutjes, Hans Reitsma, Vasiliy Vlassov
[W19] Software for computing treatment effects, performing meta-analyses, and creating forest plots Abstract
Michael Borenstein, Julian Higgins
[W20] Introduction to meta-analysis using Stata Abstract
Jonathan Sterne, Roger Harbord
[W21] Individual patient data meta-analyses Abstract
Lesley Stewart, Jayne Tierney, Claire Vale
[W22] Issues in preparing systematic reviews of complementary and alternative medicine therapies Abstract
Eric Manheimer, Jianping Liu
[W23] Using the findings of 'views' studies to explore the findings of effectiveness studies in systematic reviews Abstract
Josephine Kavanagh, Angela Harden, James Thomas, Sandy Oliver, Ginny Brunton
[W24] Systematic reviews of studies of prognosis: activation of a Prognosis Review Network Abstract
Katrina Williams, Douglas Altman, Terry Klassen, Greta Ridley, Susan Woolfenden, Jill Hayden, Jane Dennis
[W25] The Cochrane Library: hands-on searching (advanced) Abstract
Deborah Pentesco-Gilbert
[W26] Authoring and editing reviews through the new Cochrane Information Management System: an introductory workshop for review authors and editors Abstract
Jacob Riis, Liz Dooley, Susanne Ebrahim, Becky Gray, Sonja Henderson
[W27] Grading Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE): an international working group Abstract
Holger Schonemann, Gordon Guyatt, Gunn Vist
[W28] Critical appraisal skills for consumer advocates: assessing a new online course Abstract
Kay Dickersin, Elizabeth McCurdy, Laura Coe, Maryann Napoli
[W29] Workshop for Cochrane Trials Search Co-ordinators (intermediate) Abstract
Carol Lefebvre
[W30] Peer reviewing systematic reviews Abstract
Luis Gabriel Cuervo
[W31] Evidence overviews: prioritising areas for overviews of systematic reviews of interventions for effective communication with and participation by consumers Abstract
Rebecca Ryan, Sophie Hill
[W32] Lessons on integrating economic evidence into clinical practice guidelines Abstract
Michael Drummond, Kathryn Antioch
[W33] Meta-analysis of continuous data Abstract
Joanne McKenzie, Peter Herbison
[W34] Cochrane EPOC methods: complex interventions and non-randomised studies Abstract
Jeremy Grimshaw, Russell Gruen, Alain Mayhew
[W35] Incorporating data on adverse effects in systematic reviews Abstract
Andrew Herxheimer, Tony Marson, Su Golder
[W36] Workshop for Cochrane Trials Search Co-ordinators (advanced) Abstract
Carol Lefebvre
[W37] Systematic reviews of diagnostic accuracy studies 3: a practical introduction to meta-analysis Abstract
Jon Deeks, Frank Buntinx, Rob Scholten
[W38] Systematic reviews of diagnostic accuracy studies 4: advanced meta-analysis of diagnostic test performance: investigating heterogeneity and comparing tests Abstract
Petra Macaskill
[W39] Systematic reviews of diagnostic accuracy studies 5: applying the results in clinical practice Abstract
Jenny Doust, Jonathan Craig, Agostino Colli, Piergiorgio Duca
[W40] Basics of meta-analysis Abstract
Steff Lewis, Joanne McKenzie
[W41] Extracting data for a systematic review of non-randomised studies Abstract
Julian Higgins, Georgia Salanti
[W42] Extracting data for a systematic review of non-randomised studies Abstract
Barney Reeves, George Wells
[W43] How to interpret patient-reported outcomes in Cochrane reviews Abstract
Donald Patrick, Catherine Acquadro, Gordon Guyatt
[W44] MeerKat: getting the most out of your study-based Specialized Register Abstract
Meerkat Working Group
[W45] Determining study design classification of potential trial reports using MEDLINE abstracts Abstract
Susan Wieland, Anette Blumle
[W46] Applying house style to Cochrane reviews using the Cochrane Style Guide and Review Manager Abstract
Lesley Gillespie, Harriet MacLehose
[W47] Addressing dilemmas and conflicting interests faced by Cochrane review authors Abstract
Mike Clarke, Luis Gabriel Cuervo
[W48] Engaging health promotion and public health practitioners and policy makers through summary tables of the findings of Cochrane reviews Abstract
Philip Baker, Elizabeth Smith, Roger Thomas, Elizabeth Waters
[W49] Hone your skills as consumer referees for Cochrane reviews Abstract
Maryann Napoli, Janet Wale, Sharon Parker
[W50] Managing the editorial process: an advanced workshop for Cochrane Review Group Super Users in Phase 2 of the Cochrane Information Management System Abstract
Jacob Riis, Liz Dooley, Susanne Ebrahim, Becky Gray, Sonja Henderson
[W51] Promoting uptake: using the web to disseminate reviews to parents and public health decision makers Abstract
Kara DeCorby, Denise Thomson, Terry Klassen
[W52] Ways to ensure evidence-based clinical practice guidelines are of high quality Abstract
Tracy Merlin, Philippa Middleton, Janet Salisbury, Adele Weston
[W53] Minding the qualitative and feeling the width: identifying qualitative research for inclusion in systematic reviews Abstract
Andrew Booth